Credible Climate Targets and Practical Decarbonization Plans Built on Defensible Data
Setting emissions targets without a robust greenhouse gas inventory creates risk.
Commitments that are not grounded in defensible Scope 1, 2, and 3 data can expose companies to investor scrutiny, regulatory pressure, and reputational damage.
We support science-based target development and decarbonization strategy grounded in audit-ready GHG inventories and aligned with financial and operational realities.
Climate ambition must be measurable, defensible, and executable.
Why Science-Based Targets Require Rigor
Many companies commit to net zero or science-based targets before fully understanding:
Scope 3 exposure
Data maturity
Reduction feasibility
Financial implications
Supplier engagement complexity
Operational constraints
A credible target must be:
Technically aligned with SBTi methodology
Grounded in accurate baseline emissions
Supported by documented assumptions
Integrated into capital planning
Operationally achievable
We design targets that leadership can stand behind.
Who This Is For
This advisory is designed for:
Companies preparing to submit targets to the Science Based Targets initiative
Organizations upgrading climate commitments to align with 1.5°C pathways
Private equity portfolio companies establishing portfolio-level climate targets
Businesses facing investor pressure for credible decarbonization plans
Companies with growing Scope 3 exposure
If your climate commitments will be reviewed by investors, regulators, or customers, credibility matters.
Science-Based Target Development
We guide companies through a structured, defensible process aligned with SBTi and global climate frameworks.
1. Baseline Emissions Analysis
Targets are only as credible as the baseline.
We validate:
Scope 1 emissions
Scope 2 market-based and location-based calculations
Scope 3 category inclusion and methodology
Boundary consistency
Data gaps and uncertainty
Baseline documentation is built to withstand review.
2. Target Modeling and Scenario Development
We model reduction pathways aligned with:
1.5°C and well-below 2°C scenarios
Absolute contraction or intensity approaches
Sector-specific guidance where applicable
Scenario modeling includes:
Operational reduction potential
Energy transition pathways
Supplier emissions reduction feasibility
Growth projections
Capital planning integration
Targets must be technically sound and financially realistic.
3. SBTi Alignment and Submission Support
We support:
Target selection and documentation
SBTi submission package preparation
Technical questionnaire completion
Methodology transparency
Review response preparation
We ensure that submissions are aligned with SBTi criteria and clearly documented.
4. Governance and Accountability
Targets must be integrated into governance systems.
We help define:
Executive ownership
KPI integration
Performance tracking processes
Internal reporting cadence
Board-level oversight
Climate targets without accountability are ineffective.
Decarbonization Strategy and Roadmapping
Setting a target is the beginning. Executing against it is the challenge.
We build practical decarbonization roadmaps that integrate operational, financial, and supply chain realities.
Scope 1 and Scope 2 Reduction Planning
Includes:
Energy efficiency initiatives
Electrification strategies
Renewable energy procurement
On-site generation evaluation
Operational process improvements
We evaluate reduction potential alongside cost, payback period, and capital requirements.
Scope 3 Reduction Strategy
Scope 3 often represents the majority of emissions.
We support:
Category prioritization
Supplier engagement strategies
Activity-based data transition
Product lifecycle improvements
Logistics optimization
Procurement alignment
Reduction strategies must balance influence and feasibility.
Scenario and Financial Impact Analysis
We assess:
Emissions reduction trajectories
Cost implications
ROI modeling
Transition risk exposure
Regulatory scenario impacts
Decarbonization planning must connect to enterprise risk management and financial forecasting.
Integration with Broader Sustainability Programs
Climate strategy must align with:
Double materiality outcomes
ESG reporting
Risk management systems
Investor disclosures
Audit-ready carbon accounting
Fragmented climate initiatives increase complexity. Integrated programs improve execution and credibility.
Outcomes You Can Expect
Clients leave with:
A defensible science-based target aligned with SBTi
Documented baseline emissions
Modeled reduction pathways
A multi-year decarbonization roadmap
Executive and board-ready climate strategy materials
Defined ownership and governance structure
Integrated reporting alignment
This reduces risk, strengthens investor confidence, and provides clarity for operational planning.
Frequently Asked Questions
Do we need a science-based target?
Increasingly, investors and customers expect credible, 1.5°C-aligned commitments. Regulatory momentum also favors science-based alignment.
How long does target development take?
Typically 8 to 16 weeks depending on data maturity and Scope 3 complexity.
Can you help improve an existing target?
Yes. Many companies revise early targets to align with updated SBTi criteria and improved data maturity.
How does this connect to audit-ready GHG inventories?
A science-based target is only defensible if the underlying emissions data is robust. Our decarbonization work integrates directly with audit-ready carbon systems.